A Proof of God

How it all started is an impossible-to-solve puzzle because there is always an unanswered question, and there is always at least one unanswered question whilst we are limited to the human shape.

All is knowledge, and all is achievable through it.

If all is knowledge, but our existence is not enough to cope with certain pieces of knowledge, and one piece is enough, say the never-answered question, then there is something or someone who has the knowledge, and that someone or that something is not part of human kind.

Knowledge must belong to someone or something because otherwise it would not be knowledge; it would be another thing. 

Knowledge has to belong. Knowledge cannot exist per se.

Who has it then?

Nobody who is alive, and is a human being has it.

Therefore, the dead or the about-to-be-born might have it if it belongs to humanity somehow.

Not mattering to whom it belongs, it is something beyond the living creatures.


It could not be that the living creatures who are not human beings have it because they clearly know less than us.

It belongs to a non-human entity in our sense of non-human, for the body on its own cannot have knowledge, like perhaps devices inside of it can have knowledge, but not the dead body.


There is also a chance that knowledge belong to the about-to-be-born. Now we have a blurred area: are the about-to-be-born human beings?  


If they are, and knowledge belongs to them, then perhaps knowledge belongs to human beings.


However, if we can never access what they know through them, would it not be better excluding them from human kind in terms of mental maps?


Their knowledge cannot belong to human kind anyway. 

The body can have knowledge if the person is in it, if the human being is alive...

We do not call the corpse human being. 

We call the corpse dead human being, therefore non-human being.

We do not call the about-to-be-born human being, we call them human being in formation, therefore non-human being.


Now call this non-human entity, who has the knowledge, God and we then have a proof of the existence of God based on epistemic beliefs that are universally seen as beliefs of human kind.

Obs.: We have called our article with Semiotica A Solution to The Sorites to copy the name of our talk at the Newcastle University in 2000. However, we never wanted to call it either of them A Solution for we are the only ones who have the solution instead. Our research supervisor insisted that we called our work that way. This little piece, however, we call A Proof of God for willing to call it this way. 


There must be zillions of proofs of the existence of God. This is just one more.